ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs. MSI Radeon RX 590 Armor 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
-VS-
MSI Radeon RX 590 Armor 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5) Based on AMD Radeon RX 590
TU117-300-A1 GPU Chip Polaris 30
14 Execution units 36
896 Shader 2304
32 Render Output Units 32
56 Texture Units 144
Memory
4 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR5
2 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
128 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.485 GHz Base Clock 1.469 GHz
1.695 GHz Boost Clock 1.545 GHz
1.67 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
75 W TDP 220 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 80 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
204 mm Length 278 mm
115 mm Height 143 mm
37 mm Width 40 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 873 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-GTX1650-4G Part-no --
Q2/2019 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
2. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo
3. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
4. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
5. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
6. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G
7. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black
8. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
9. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC
10. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS
11. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO
12. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
13. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR
14. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI
15. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
16. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
17. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White
18. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
19. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
21. ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
22. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT SF 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT SF 8G
23. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
25. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650


back to index
Facebook
Twitter