ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
-VS-
XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Based on AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
TU104 GPU Chip Navi 22 XT
46 Execution units 40
2944 Shader 2560
64 Render Output Units 64
184 Texture Units 160
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 384 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.515 GHz Base Clock 2.321 GHz
1.730 GHz Boost Clock 2.581 GHz
1.71 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 2.42 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 230 W
250 W TDP (up) --
89 °C Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 1 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 2 x 90 mm
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
34 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
42 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
268 mm Length 304 mm
114 mm Height 123 mm
58 mm Width 42 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX2080-8G Part-no RX-67XTYJFDV
Q3/2018 Release date Q1/2021
749 $ Release price --
12 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Ultra Gaming XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming XFX Speedster QICK 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Ultra Gaming vs XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
2. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Black Gaming XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6700 XT Black Gaming vs XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
3. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC) XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC)
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G
6. PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
11. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT vs XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
12. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Black Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Black Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
13. Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phantom GS ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phantom GS vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
14. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FTW3 Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FTW3 Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
15. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 vs XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
16. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming Trio 24G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming Trio 24G
18. Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
19. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo vs XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming
20. PNY GeForce RTX 3070 UPRISING Dual Fan ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 PNY GeForce RTX 3070 UPRISING Dual Fan vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
22. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming X Trio
23. Palit GeForce RTX 2080 JetStream ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Palit GeForce RTX 2080 JetStream vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
24. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter