ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 LHR Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 LHR
GA106-302-A1 GPU Chip GA106-302-A1
28 Execution units 28
3584 Shader 3584
64 Render Output Units 64
112 Texture Units 112
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.875 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
360 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.320 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.807 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % Boost Clock 1.807 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
1.78 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.78 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
170 W TDP 170 W
170 W TDP (up) 180 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 6 %
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
35 dB Noise (Load) 33 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
200 mm Length 301 mm
123 mm Height 143 mm
38 mm Width 54 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX3060-12G-V2 Part-no TUF-RTX3060-12G-V2-GAMING
Q2/2021 Release date Q2/2021
329 $ Release price 509 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
2. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 White ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 White
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
4. GIGABYTE Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GIGABYTE Radeon RX Vega 56 Gaming OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR
6. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 WINDFORCE OC 4G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1650 D6 WINDFORCE OC 4G
8. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE 8G
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming X
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
18. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060


back to index
Facebook
Twitter