ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 OC Edition LHR
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 LHR Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
GA106-302-A1 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
28 Execution units 28
3584 Shader 3584
64 Render Output Units 64
112 Texture Units 112
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.875 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
360 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.320 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.867 GHz Boost Clock 1.867 GHz
1.84 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.84 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
170 W TDP 170 W
170 W TDP (up) 170 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
200 mm Length 200 mm
123 mm Height 123 mm
38 mm Width 38 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX3060-O12G-V2 Part-no DUAL-RTX3060-O12G
Q2/2021 Release date Q1/2021
459 $ Release price 459 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
6. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING 12G
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT
11. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
12. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G
14. Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB
16. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
17. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC
19. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ELITE 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ELITE 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
20. MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 3X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 3X 8G
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming


back to index
Facebook
Twitter