ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
-VS-
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip Navi 22 XT
46 Execution units 40
5888 Shader 2560
96 Render Output Units 64
184 Texture Units 160
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 384 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 2.321 GHz
1.755 GHz Boost Clock 2.581 GHz
1.73 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 2.42 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
220 W TDP 230 W
250 W TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
43-45 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
267 mm Length 267 mm
135 mm Height 110 mm
52 mm Width 40 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX3070-8G Part-no RX6700XT-12G
Q4/2020 Release date Q1/2021
649 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
79 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
72 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
139 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
144 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
186 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
192 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
51 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
50 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
91 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
92 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6
144 fps (avg)
Amazon
ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12 GB GDDR6
128 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070
2. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
3. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070
4. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
6. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
9. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G
10. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Gaming ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Gaming vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
12. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
13. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
15. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
16. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
18. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
19. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
20. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
21. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G
23. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
24. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce OC 11G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter