ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
-VS-
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 580 Based on AMD Radeon RX 590
Polaris 20 XT GPU Chip Polaris 30
36 Execution units 36
2304 Shader 2304
32 Render Output Units 32
144 Texture Units 144
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR5
2 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
256 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.257 GHz Base Clock 1.469 GHz
1.380 GHz Boost Clock 1.545 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
185 W TDP 225 W
-- TDP (up) 235 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
2x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12 DirectX 12
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
242 mm Length 230 mm
129 mm Height 125 mm
38 mm Width 40 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RX580-O8G Part-no 11289-06
Q4/2017 Release date Q4/2018
-- Release price --
14 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G XFX Speedster SWFT 309 Radeon RX 6700 XT Core Gaming vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
2. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 570 4G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 570 4G vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
3. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 EKWB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs ASUS GeForce RTX 3070 EKWB
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
5. ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASUS Turbo GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE 3X 8G Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER WINDFORCE 3X 8G vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
7. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
8. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 OC Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 OC vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
9. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
10. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
11. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
12. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
14. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition
15. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 OC 8G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 OC 8G vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
16. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 GamingPro
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
18. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 vs ASRock Radeon RX 6900 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC
19. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GP ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GP
20. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 590 8G G5
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
22. XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 8GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 8GB vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G
23. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X4 LHR ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X4 LHR
24. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 8G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT OC 8G
25. Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter