ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
- vs -
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
-VS-
ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC

GPU

AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Based on AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Navi 23 XT GPU Chip Navi 23 XT
32 Execution units 32
2048 Shader 2048
64 Render Output Units 64
128 Texture Units 128

Memory

8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
2.000 GHz Memory Clock 2.000 GHz
16 Gbps Memory Speed 16 Gbps
256 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 128 bit

Clock Speeds

2.000 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % Base Clock 2.000 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
2.607 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 1 % Boost Clock 2.593 GHz
2.40 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % Avg (Game) Clock 2.38 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 1 %
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

160 W TDP 160 W
-- TDP (up) --
110 °C Tjunction max 110 °C
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --

Connectivity

4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR No
ASUS Aura Sync LED Addressable LED

Supported Video Codecs

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode / Encode

Dimensions

243 mm Length 269 mm
134 mm Height 132 mm
49 mm Width 41 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 640 g
PCIe 4.0 x 8 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 8

Additional data

-- Part-no RX6600XT CLD 8GO
Q3/2021 Release date Q3/2021
-- Release price --
7 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Popular comparisons

1. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6600 XT ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6600 XT vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
3. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
4. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6600 XT ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6600 XT
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC
6. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC
7. MSI GeForce GTX 1070 TI GAMING 8G ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC MSI GeForce GTX 1070 TI GAMING 8G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC
8. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT MECH 2X 8G ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT MECH 2X 8G
9. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6600 XT ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6600 XT
10. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6600 XT Eagle 8G ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6600 XT Eagle 8G
11. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6600 XT ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6600 XT
12. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming OC Pro 8G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6600 XT Gaming OC Pro 8G
13. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6600 XT ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6600 XT
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC
15. PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6600 XT ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6600 XT vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
16. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
17. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger Pro 8GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger Pro 8GB OC
18. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT MECH 2X 8G OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs MSI Radeon RX 6600 XT MECH 2X 8G OC
19. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC
20. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6600 XT ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6600 XT vs ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC
21. MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4G OC vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
22. ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC XFX Speedster MERC308 Radeon RX 6600 XT BLACK Gaming ASRock Radeon RX 6600 XT Challenger D 8GB OC vs XFX Speedster MERC308 Radeon RX 6600 XT BLACK Gaming
23. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC vs Palit GeForce GTX 1060 JetStream 6GB
24. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC
25. XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Core Gaming ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC XFX Speedster SWFT 210 AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT Core Gaming vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6600 XT OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter