ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
-VS-
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GA102-200-K1-A1 GPU Chip GA102-200-K1-A1
68 Execution units 68
8704 Shader 8704
96 Render Output Units 96
272 Texture Units 272
Memory
10 GB Memory Size 10 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6X
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 1.188 GHz
760 GB/s Memory Bandwith 760 GB/s
320 bit Memory Interface 320 bit
Clock Speeds
1.440 GHz Base Clock 1.440 GHz
1.740 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 % Boost Clock 1.935 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 13 %
1.71 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.91 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
320 W TDP 370 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 16 %
370 W TDP (up) 450 WDeviation vs GPU group+ 22 %
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 3 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
-- Fan-Type Axial
-- Fan 1 3 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Water cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
0 dB Noise (Load) 42 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
216 mm Length 319 mm
136 mm Height 140 mm
20 mm Width 58 mm
1 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1900 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
RTX3080-10G-EK Part-no ROG-STRIX-RTX3080-O10G-GAMING
Q3/2020 Release date Q3/2020
859 $ Release price 799 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 GAMING X TRIO 10G
2. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GUNDAM EDITION ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GUNDAM EDITION vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
3. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
4. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
5. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
6. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
7. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme 10G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme 10G
8. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
9. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
10. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
11. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080
13. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
14. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
15. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING
16. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G
17. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream
18. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
20. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
21. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
22. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G
23. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
24. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
25. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo


back to index
Facebook
Twitter