ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
-VS-
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Based on AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GA102-200-K1-A1 GPU Chip Navi 21
68 Execution units 80
8704 Shader 5120
96 Render Output Units 128
272 Texture Units 320
Memory
10 GB Memory Size 16 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
760 GB/s Memory Bandwith 512 GB/s
320 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.440 GHz Base Clock 1.825 GHz
1.740 GHz Boost Clock 2.365 GHz
1.71 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 2.14 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
320 W TDP 400 W
370 W TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
-- Fan-Type Axial
-- Fan 1 3 x 120 mm
-- Fan 2 1 x 90 mm
Water cooling Cooler-Type AIO water cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
0 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
216 mm Length 270 mm
136 mm Height 130 mm
20 mm Width 45 mm
1 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1148 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
RTX3080-10G-EK Part-no 11308-06-20G
Q3/2020 Release date Q1/2021
859 $ Release price 1,499 $
8 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White
2. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
3. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
4. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Black Gaming
5. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
6. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT OC
7. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
8. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
9. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
10. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
11. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING
12. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING
13. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G
14. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
15. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 JetStream
16. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
17. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
18. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
20. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3080 VENTUS 3X 10G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
22. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo
23. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
24. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1


back to index
Facebook
Twitter