ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs. Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
-VS-
Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
TU116-400-A1 GPU Chip TU106
24 Execution units 30
1536 Shader 1920
48 Render Output Units 48
96 Texture Units 120
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
288 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.815 GHz Boost Clock 1.830 GHz
1.79 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 190 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 1x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
174 mm Length 235 mm
121 mm Height 112 mm
39 mm Width --
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
PH-GTX1660TI-O6G Part-no 426018336-4313
Q1/2019 Release date Q1/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Hybrid Gaming Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Hybrid Gaming vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS
2. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC
3. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS
4. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER FTW3 Ultra Gaming Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER FTW3 Ultra Gaming vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS
5. Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE OC 24G Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE OC 24G
6. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
7. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 3060
8. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix GS
9. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060
10. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Phoenix


back to index
Facebook
Twitter