ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
- vs -
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO

GPU

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GP107-300-A1 GPU Chip TU106
5 Execution units 30
640 Shader 1920
32 Render Output Units 48
40 Texture Units 120

Memory

2 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR6
1.752 GHz Memory Clock 1.750 GHz
7 Gbps Memory Speed 14 Gbps
112 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 192 bit

Clock Speeds

1.354 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.455 GHz Boost Clock 1.725 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.70 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes

Thermal Design

75 W TDP 160 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin

Cooler & Fans

Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --

Connectivity

3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
-- HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports --
2 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --

Featureset

7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Non addressable LED LED No LED lighting

Supported Video Codecs

Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
No VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode

Dimensions

241 mm Length 242 mm
129 mm Height 130 mm
40 mm Width 53 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16

Additional data

ROG-STRIX-GTX1050-2G-GAMING Part-no DUAL-RTX2060-A6G-EVO
Q3/2016 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
14 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.

If you are looking for a reliable cryptocurrency exchange that regularly includes new cryptocurrencies, we recommend Kraken.com.




FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS GP OC
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G
6. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GP ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GP
8. PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual
10. MANLI GeForce GTX 1660Ti (M1431+N524-02) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO MANLI GeForce GTX 1660Ti (M1431+N524-02) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
11. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
12. ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Taichi X 16G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Taichi X 16G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
13. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER BLACK GAMING ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER BLACK GAMING vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G
15. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
17. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING OC X2 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO INNO3D GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING OC X2 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
18. PowerColor Radeon RX 5500 XT 4G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO PowerColor Radeon RX 5500 XT 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO Colorful GeForce RTX 3070 Ti NB 8G-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3070 Ti NB 8G-V
20. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Phoenix Radeon RX 550 2G EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs ASUS Phoenix Radeon RX 550 2G EVO
21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
22. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC2 Ultra ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC2 Ultra vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
24. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC 8G (rev. 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 XT Gaming OC 8G (rev. 2.0) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter