ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GP104-200-A1 GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
15 Execution units 46
1920 Shader 5888
64 Render Output Units 96
120 Texture Units 184
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR6
2.002 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
256 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.506 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
1.721 GHz Boost Clock 1.755 GHz
1.68 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.73 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
150 W TDP 220 W
-- TDP (up) 250 W
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 43-45 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
2x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
298 mm Length 267 mm
134 mm Height 135 mm
40 mm Width 52 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
ROG-STRIX-GTX1070-8G-GAMING Part-no DUAL-RTX3070-8G
Q2/2016 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 649 $
16 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
2. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
6. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
7. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
10. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
11. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
12. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
13. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
14. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Windforce OC 11G
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Evo
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
20. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Black Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 XC3 Black Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ITX 8G V2 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070


back to index
Facebook
Twitter