ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
-VS-
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU (Mobile)
TU106 GPU Chip GA107
30 Execution units 16
1920 Shader 2048
48 Render Output Units 40
120 Texture Units 64
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.5 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 192 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.365 GHz Base Clock 0.712 GHz
1.710 GHz Boost Clock 1.057 GHz
1.68 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
160 W TDP 35 W
-- TDP (up) 50 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Radial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 --
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports --
2x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4b
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
300 mm Length --
132 mm Height --
50 mm Width --
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) --
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
ROG-STRIX-RTX2060-6G-GAMING Part-no --
Q1/2019 Release date Q2/2021
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
2. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
3. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
4. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi X 8G OC+ ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Taichi X 8G OC+
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
6. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
7. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 FTW3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
8. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
9. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming
10. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 8G (rev. 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER WINDFORCE OC 8G (rev. 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
11. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual OC
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
14. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
16. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 MINI ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 MINI
17. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop (Mobile) - 150 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Laptop (Mobile) - 150 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
18. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
19. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W MANLI GeForce GTX 1660Ti (M1431+N524-02) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs MANLI GeForce GTX 1660Ti (M1431+N524-02)
20. ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
21. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti MASTER 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti MASTER 8G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
22. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
23. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060
24. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060
25. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W


back to index
Facebook
Twitter