ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
-VS-
MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
TU104 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
40 Execution units 28
2560 Shader 3584
64 Render Output Units 64
160 Texture Units 112
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.800 GHz Boost Clock 1.792 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.78 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 170 W
-- TDP (up) 170 W
88 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 85 mm Fan 1 1 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 40 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
2x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
300 mm Length 172 mm
130 mm Height 125 mm
54 mm Width 43 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 503 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
ROG-STRIX-RTX2070S-8G-GAMING Part-no --
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price 399 $
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
2. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
3. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
4. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming Trio 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
6. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
7. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming
8. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming
9. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
10. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
11. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G
13. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
14. Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GRP ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GRP vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
17. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
19. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GamingPro MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GamingPro vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
21. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
22. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
23. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC PNY GeForce RTX 3070 UPRISING Dual Fan MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs PNY GeForce RTX 3070 UPRISING Dual Fan
24. ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC
25. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS XS 6G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 VENTUS XS 6G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter