ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
-VS-
ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Based on AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
GA102-300-A1 GPU Chip Navi 21 XT
82 Execution units 72
10496 Shader 4608
112 Render Output Units 128
328 Texture Units 288
Memory
24 GB Memory Size 16 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.219 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
936 GB/s Memory Bandwith 512 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.395 GHz Base Clock 1.925 GHz
1.725 GHz Boost Clock 2.360 GHz
1.70 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 2.11 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
350 W TDP 300 W
-- TDP (up) 345 W
93 °C Tjunction max 96 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 95 mm Fan 1 1 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 2 x 120 mm
Air cooling Cooler-Type AIO water cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
37-43 dB Noise (Load) 37-38 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports 1
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
300 mm Length 277 mm
127 mm Height 131 mm
52 mm Width 44 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
TUF-RTX3090-24G-GAMING Part-no ROG-STRIX-LC-RX6800XT-O16G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q1/2021
1,689 $ Release price 999 $
8 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM X 10G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
4. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G
7. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
10. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 MASTER 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC
13. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC White ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC White vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
14. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X3 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL X3
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
16. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
17. Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
18. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC
19. GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 (1-Click OC) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 (1-Click OC) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
20. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC PNY GeForce RTX 2060 Blower ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs PNY GeForce RTX 2060 Blower
21. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Phantom GLH ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Phantom GLH
22. ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ARMOR OC
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 MINI ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 MINI
24. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER XC GAMING ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER XC GAMING
25. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC White ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC White vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6800 XT OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter