EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC vs. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060

GPU comparison with benchmarks

EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC
-VS-
ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
TU116-400-A1 GPU Chip TU106
24 Execution units 30
1536 Shader 1920
48 Render Output Units 48
96 Texture Units 120
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
288 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.845 GHz Boost Clock 1.710 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.68 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 160 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 1 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports --
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
190 mm Length 177 mm
111 mm Height 121 mm
-- Width 39 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
06G-P4-1263-KR Part-no PH-RTX2060-6G
Q1/2019 Release date Q1/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 Advanced ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 Advanced vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
2. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE 24G ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 EAGLE 24G
3. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC) ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS EX (1-Click OC)
4. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6800 XT Core Gaming
5. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G
6. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
7. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
8. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming Trio ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Gaming Trio vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC
10. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ICHILL FROSTBITE EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ICHILL FROSTBITE
11. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 3060 vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
12. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
14. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 TI ARMOR 6G OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 TI ARMOR 6G OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
15. KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary White Edition EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary White Edition vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC
16. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge OC White Edition ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge OC White Edition
17. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
18. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING Z PLUS vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
19. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
20. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX Vega 56 OC Gaming ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX Vega 56 OC Gaming vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
21. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING TRIO ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING TRIO
22. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060
23. EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 EX (1-Click OC) EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti XC OC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 EX (1-Click OC)
24. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme Gaming 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1080 Xtreme Gaming 8G
25. ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Phoenix GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition


back to index
Facebook
Twitter