EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+
-VS-
MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
TU104 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
40 Execution units 22
2560 Shader 1408
64 Render Output Units 48
160 Texture Units 88
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.938 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
496 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.800 GHz Boost Clock 1.815 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 125 W
-- TDP (up) --
88 °C Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
270 mm Length 231 mm
111 mm Height 128 mm
-- Width 42 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 718 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
08G-P4-3175-KR Part-no --
Q3/2019 Release date Q4/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+
2. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G
3. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO
4. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Ultra Gaming EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Ultra Gaming vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+
5. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ ASRock Radeon RX 6800 Challenger Pro 16G OC EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs ASRock Radeon RX 6800 Challenger Pro 16G OC
6. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate
7. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ Palit GeForce RTX 2080 EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs Palit GeForce RTX 2080
8. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER XC ULTRA+ vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC
9. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8G MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8G
10. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GAMING X
11. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC
12. Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GP MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER GP vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC
13. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W
14. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX Vega 64 Silver 8G MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER VENTUS OC vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX Vega 64 Silver 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter