EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650

GPU comparison with benchmarks

EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5)
GA102-300-A1 GPU Chip TU117-300-A1
82 Execution units 14
10496 Shader 896
112 Render Output Units 32
328 Texture Units 56
Memory
24 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR5
1.219 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
936 GB/s Memory Bandwith 128 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.395 GHz Base Clock 1.485 GHz
1.725 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.67 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
350 W TDP 75 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 80 mm
2 x 90 mm Fan 2 --
AIO water cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
263 mm Length 204 mm
112 mm Height 115 mm
-- Width 37 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
24G-P5-3978-KR Part-no DUAL-GTX1650-4G
Q4/2020 Release date Q2/2019
1,700 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC2 Ultra EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC2 Ultra
2. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYDRO COPPER GAMING
3. ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
4. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER iCHILL Frostbite EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER iCHILL Frostbite vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING
5. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 Evo
6. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3090 Phantom GS
7. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge OC
8. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
9. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming OC 11G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
12. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black
13. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G
14. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC
15. EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Challenger Pro 8G OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 XT Challenger Pro 8G OC
16. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO
17. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS
18. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
19. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR
21. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 TI
22. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
23. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White
24. GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Work The Frames Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA HYBRID GAMING
25. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter