Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS
-VS-
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GP104-400-A1 / GP104-410-A1 GPU Chip TU106
20 Execution units 34
2560 Shader 2176
64 Render Output Units 64
160 Texture Units 136
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR5X Memory Type GDDR6
1.251 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
320 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.708 GHz Base Clock 1.470 GHz
1.847 GHz Boost Clock 1.650 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
180 W TDP 184 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
285 mm Length 232 mm
133 mm Height 127 mm
-- Width 42 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 728 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
426018336-3644 Part-no --
Q2/2016 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
16 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
2. Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GRP MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GRP vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP
3. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP MSI GeForce RTX 2070 ARMOR 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 ARMOR 8G
4. Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix GS (DVI) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix GS (DVI) vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP
5. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER OC
6. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP vs Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity OC
7. Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X 8G Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X 8G
8. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition
9. Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs MSI GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP
10. Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
11. Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Aero Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Aero


back to index
Facebook
Twitter