Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Pegasus vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 D6 Pegasus
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 GPU Chip TU106
14 Execution units 30
896 Shader 1920
32 Render Output Units 48
56 Texture Units 120
Memory
4 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.590 GHz Boost Clock 1.785 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.76 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
75 W TDP 160 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
168 mm Length 270 mm
126 mm Height 111 mm
-- Width 58 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
NE61650018G1-166F Part-no DUAL-RTX2060-O6G
Q2/2020 Release date Q1/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 XLR8 Gaming Overclocked Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition PNY GeForce RTX 2070 XLR8 Gaming Overclocked Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
3. ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
4. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO OC
6. ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
7. PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 56 Red Devil ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition PowerColor Radeon RX Vega 56 Red Devil vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
8. Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GLH ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GLH vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6G-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6G-V
10. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5700 XT OC Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5700 XT OC Evo
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
12. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
13. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
14. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5600 XT OC Evo ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 Radeon RX 5600 XT OC Evo
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 8G OC
17. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
18. GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER OC
20. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
21. Zotac GAMING GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Twin Fan ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition Zotac GAMING GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Twin Fan vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 11G
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
25. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC 6G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI OC 6G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition


back to index
Facebook
Twitter