GALAX GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GALAX GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
-VS-
ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
GP106-410-A1 GPU Chip GP106-410-A1
10 Execution units 10
1280 Shader 1280
48 Render Output Units 48
80 Texture Units 80
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR5
2.002 GHz Memory Speed 2.002 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 192 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.506 GHz Base Clock 1.506 GHz
1.708 GHz Boost Clock 1.708 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 120 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 70 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
No VP8 No
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
255 mm Length 242 mm
125 mm Height 130 mm
42 mm Width 43 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
60NRH7DHL6VT Part-no DUAL-GTX1060-6G
Q3/2016 Release date Q3/2016
-- Release price --
16 nm Structure size 16 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
3. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Founders Edition ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Founders Edition vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
4. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
5. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
6. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC
7. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W
8. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 OC ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 580 OC vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
9. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
10. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G
11. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
12. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060
13. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G
14. GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 (1-Click OC) vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
15. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 4G
16. MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 4G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 4G vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
18. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
19. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
20. XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 8GB ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS XXX Edition 8GB vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
21. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
22. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 4G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 4G vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
23. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
24. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FOUNDERS EDITION ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 FOUNDERS EDITION
25. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs ASUS Radeon RX 6800 XT


back to index
Facebook
Twitter