GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs. PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC
-VS-
PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
TU106 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
36 Execution units 22
2304 Shader 1408
64 Render Output Units 48
144 Texture Units 88
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.815 GHz Boost Clock 1.830 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
175 W TDP 125 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
283 mm Length 232 mm
139 mm Height 125 mm
41 mm Width 42 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
27NSL6UCT7OC Part-no VCG16606SDFMPB-O
Q4/2018 Release date Q4/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. INNO3D GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER TWIN X2 OC RGB GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC INNO3D GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER TWIN X2 OC RGB vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC
2. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER DUAL V1 GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER DUAL V1
3. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC MSI GeForce GTX 1650 AERO ITX 4G OCV1 GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs MSI GeForce GTX 1650 AERO ITX 4G OCV1
4. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC
5. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan
6. PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING
7. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS Gamer (1-Click OC) GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 PLUS Gamer (1-Click OC)
8. PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan PNY GeForce GTX 1660 TI 6GB Blower PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Dual Fan vs PNY GeForce GTX 1660 TI 6GB Blower
9. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING TWIN X2 GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 GAMING TWIN X2 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter