GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) vs. MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC)
-VS-
MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Based on AMD Radeon RX 580
GA102-225-A1 GPU Chip Polaris 20 XT
80 Execution units 36
10240 Shader 2304
96 Render Output Units 32
320 Texture Units 144
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR5
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
912 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.365 GHz Base Clock 1.257 GHz
1.725 GHz Boost Clock 1.393 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
350 W TDP 185 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
3 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 92 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
1 x 102 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
330 mm Length 276 mm
142 mm Height 140 mm
58 mm Width 42 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 978 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
38IOM5MD1JAA Part-no --
Q2/2021 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
8 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC)
2. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC)
3. GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
4. GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) vs Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER WGR
5. ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 6GB MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 6GB vs MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G
6. MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX OC Gamer MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX OC Gamer
7. GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) vs MSI Radeon RX 580 Gaming X 4G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter