GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0)
-VS-
Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
TU104 GPU Chip GA106-300-A1
40 Execution units 28
2560 Shader 3584
64 Render Output Units 64
160 Texture Units 112
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.800 GHz Boost Clock 1.777 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 170 W
-- TDP (up) --
88 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 1 x 80 mm
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
3x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
290 mm Length 310 mm
134 mm Height 130 mm
60 mm Width 53 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1000 g
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N207SAORUS-8GC Part-no --
Q3/2019 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Advanced OC 12G-V Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3060 Advanced OC 12G-V
2. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Trio 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Trio 8G
3. Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6800 vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0)
4. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
5. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 VENTUS 8G Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V MSI GeForce RTX 2070 VENTUS 8G vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
6. EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC BLACK GAMING GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC BLACK GAMING vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0)
7. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition
8. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC White 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC White 8G
9. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Ghost OC Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 Ghost OC
10. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
11. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC Gaming GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC Gaming
12. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC
13. ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0)
14. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC 6G Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC 6G vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
15. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Raw II Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Raw II
16. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070
17. Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER DUAL Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER DUAL vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
18. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
19. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V Colorful GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NB-V Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3080 Ti NB-V
20. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
22. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8G Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor 8G
23. Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G (rev. 2.0) vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO Advanced Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO Advanced vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V


back to index
Facebook
Twitter