GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G vs. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G
-VS-
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 LHR
TU116-400-A1 GPU Chip GA106-302-A1
24 Execution units 28
1536 Shader 3584
48 Render Output Units 64
96 Texture Units 112
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.875 GHz
288 GB/s Memory Bandwith 360 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.320 GHz
1.860 GHz Boost Clock 1.867 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.78 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 170 W
-- TDP (up) 180 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 80 mm Fan 1 3 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 34 dB
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
280 mm Length 296 mm
117 mm Height 117 mm
40 mm Width 56 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N166TGAMING OC-6GD Part-no GV-N3060AORUS E-12GD
Q1/2019 Release date Q2/2021
-- Release price 459 $
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ELITE 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ELITE 8G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
2. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER VENTUS OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
3. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
4. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio 8G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
5. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Trinity GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Trinity vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
6. PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G PNY GeForce RTX 3060 XLR8 Gaming REVEL EPIC-X RGB Single Fan Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G
7. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR
8. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ultra OC-V GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ultra OC-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G
9. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G OC
10. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
11. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 OC 6G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
12. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
13. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
14. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
15. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti GAMING GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti GAMING
16. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G
17. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
18. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 Ti GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
19. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo
20. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
21. GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Black Edition Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1660 TI GAMING OC 6G vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Black Edition Gaming
22. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
23. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Edge OC LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Edge OC LHR
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR


back to index
Facebook
Twitter