GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0)
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
TU106 GPU Chip TU106
30 Execution units 30
1920 Shader 1920
48 Render Output Units 48
120 Texture Units 120
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.365 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.830 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 9 % Boost Clock 1.785 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 6 %
Avg (Game) Clock 1.76 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
160 W TDP 160 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 80 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports --
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
280 mm Length 242 mm
117 mm Height 130 mm
40 mm Width 53 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N2060GAMINGOC PRO-6GD Part-no DUAL-RTX2060-O6G-EVO
Q1/2019 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 2.0) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
4. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
6. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
7. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Black Edition Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Black Edition Gaming vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC)
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
10. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming Trio 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming Trio 24G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0)
11. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO MSI GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING X 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO Advanced Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 EVO Advanced Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
13. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 FTW3 ULTRA OVERCLOCKED ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 FTW3 ULTRA OVERCLOCKED vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
14. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600H-10M) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 (ZT-T20600H-10M) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
15. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE OC 6G (rev. 1.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 WINDFORCE OC 6G (rev. 1.0) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer (1-Click OC) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer (1-Click OC)
17. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 D6 6G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Founders Edition
20. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Vulcan OC-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING OC PRO 6G (rev. 1.0) vs Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Vulcan OC-V
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Black Gaming
23. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
25. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 AMP ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 AMP vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO


back to index
Facebook
Twitter