GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
-VS-
GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
TU104 GPU Chip TU106
48 Execution units 34
3072 Shader 2176
64 Render Output Units 64
192 Texture Units 136
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.938 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
496 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.650 GHz Base Clock 1.470 GHz
1.845 GHz Boost Clock 1.650 GHz
1.82 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
250 W TDP 175 W
280 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Radial
3 x 82 mm Fan 1 1 x 65 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
44 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
287 mm Length 283 mm
115 mm Height 139 mm
50 mm Width 41 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N208SGAMING OC-8GC Part-no 26ISL6MDZ8BW
Q3/2019 Release date Q3/2019
749 $ Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G OC
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
3. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX (1-Click OC) V2 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 EX (1-Click OC) V2 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
4. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
5. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN OC X2 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 TWIN OC X2
6. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Sea Hawk X GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Sea Hawk X vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
7. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
8. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mini GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Mini vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 8G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce 8G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
10. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix
11. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
12. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Waterforce 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
13. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
14. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary White Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary White Edition
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
16. INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 ICHILL X3 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER INNO3D GeForce RTX 2060 ICHILL X3 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
17. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC)
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Advanced GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 Advanced
20. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AERO ITX V1 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER AERO ITX V1 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
21. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti iCHILL X4 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 Ti iCHILL X4
22. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 White
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0)
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G OCV1 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G OCV1


back to index
Facebook
Twitter