GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
-VS-
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 LHR Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GA106-302-A1 GPU Chip TU116-250-KA-A1
28 Execution units 20
3584 Shader 1280
64 Render Output Units 32
112 Texture Units 80
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.875 GHz Memory Speed 1.5 GHz
360 GB/s Memory Bandwith 192 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.320 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.807 GHz Boost Clock 1.755 GHz
1.78 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.73 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
170 W TDP 100 W
180 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 1 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
35 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
2x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
242 mm Length 174 mm
124 mm Height 121 mm
41 mm Width 39 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N3060EAGLE OC-12GD Part-no PH-GTX1650S-4G
Q2/2021 Release date Q4/2019
439 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 AMP White Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
3. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 iCHILL FROSTBITE GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 iCHILL FROSTBITE
4. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT SF 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT SF 8G
5. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Eagle OC 8G
7. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
8. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
9. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
10. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
12. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
13. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 EVO ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 EVO
14. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
15. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ultra-V GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ultra-V vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
17. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6G
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
22. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 2060 GAMING Z 6G vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
23. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
24. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 8G
25. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Mini ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER Mini vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER


back to index
Facebook
Twitter