GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 XTR 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
-VS-
GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 XTR 8G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR Based on AMD Radeon RX 580
GA104-202-A1 GPU Chip Polaris 20 XT
38 Execution units 36
4864 Shader 2304
80 Render Output Units 32
152 Texture Units 144
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 256 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.257 GHz
1.755 GHz Boost Clock 1.439 GHz
1.67 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
200 W TDP 185 W
240 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 80 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
36 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
2x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
281 mm Length 276 mm
115 mm Height 134 mm
40 mm Width 55 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N306TVISION OC-8GD Part-no GV-RX580XTRAORUS-8GD
Q2/2021 Release date Q4/2017
449 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum edition
3. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin X2 OC LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin X2 OC LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
4. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G
5. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC
6. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
7. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming PRO 8G (Rev. 2.0) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming PRO 8G (Rev. 2.0) vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
8. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G (rev. 2.0) LHR
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
10. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Fan 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Fan 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo
12. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2080 AMP GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2080 AMP
13. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC
14. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
15. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Vision OC 12G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G (rev 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G (rev 2.0) LHR
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR AMD Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
20. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
21. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti iCHILL X3 RED LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Ti iCHILL X3 RED LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
22. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR
23. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Ghost
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 XTR 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G (rev. 2.0) LHR vs GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 580 XTR 8G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter