GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)

GPU comparison with benchmarks

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
-VS-
Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Based on AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
GA102-300-A1 GPU Chip Navi 21
82 Execution units 80
10496 Shader 5120
112 Render Output Units 128
328 Texture Units 320
Memory
24 GB Memory Size 16 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.219 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
936 GB/s Memory Bandwith 512 GB/s
384 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.395 GHz Base Clock 1.825 GHz
1.755 GHz Boost Clock 2.365 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 2.14 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
350 W TDP 400 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 120 mm
1 x 80 mm Fan 2 1 x 90 mm
Air cooling Cooler-Type AIO water cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
43 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
2x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
320 mm Length 270 mm
126 mm Height 130 mm
55 mm Width 45 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 1148 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
GV-N3090VISION OC-24GD Part-no 11308-06-20G
Q4/2020 Release date Q1/2021
1,659 $ Release price 1,499 $
8 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
2. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 White
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim X 24G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
4. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Gaming X Trio 24G
5. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Suprim 24G
7. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT OC
8. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 TURBO 24G
9. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition
10. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 10G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 10G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
11. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080
12. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 KINGPIN HYBRID GAMING
13. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090
14. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
15. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
17. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini OC vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
19. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 2X 8G V1
20. GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) GIGABYTE AORUS Radeon RX 6800 XT Master Type C 16G vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
21. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X3 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X3
22. PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)
23. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix GS (DVI) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phoenix GS (DVI)
24. Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435) V2 Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0) Manli GeForce RTX 2060 Gallardo (M2435) V2 vs Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition (rev 2.0)


back to index
Facebook
Twitter