INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip GA104-200-A1
46 Execution units 38
5888 Shader 4864
96 Render Output Units 80
184 Texture Units 152
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.410 GHz
1.785 GHz Boost Clock 1.785 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.76 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
240 W TDP 200 W
-- TDP (up) 220 W
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 95 mm
1 x 45 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
41-43 dB Noise (Load) 33-35 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
300 mm Length 301 mm
135 mm Height 143 mm
-- Width 54 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
C30704-08D6X-1710VA35 Part-no TUF-RTX3060TI-O8G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2020
599 $ Release price 479 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
2. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
3. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
4. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 8G
5. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
6. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
7. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Eagle OC 8G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Twin Fan 8G OC
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
10. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
11. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
13. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
14. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition
15. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
17. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
18. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
19. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
20. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 GAMING OC 24G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
21. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G
22. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Ventus XS
23. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
24. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Twin Fan
25. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI Radeon RX 5700 Mech INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 Mech


back to index
Facebook
Twitter