KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX PLUS (1-Click OC) GDDR6 vs. AMD Radeon RX 6800

GPU comparison with benchmarks

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1650 EX PLUS (1-Click OC) GDDR6
-VS-
AMD Radeon RX 6800
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) Based on AMD Radeon RX 6800
TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1 GPU Chip Navi 21
14 Execution units 60
896 Shader 3840
32 Render Output Units 96
56 Texture Units 240
Memory
4 GB Memory Size 16 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 512 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.410 GHz Base Clock 1.700 GHz
1.635 GHz Boost Clock 2.105 GHz
1.61 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.82 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
90 W TDP 250 W
-- TDP (up) 285 W
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 80 mm Fan 1 3 x 85 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 35 dB
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
1 DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports 1
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_2
No Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
215 mm Length 267 mm
126 mm Height 120 mm
39 mm Width --
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
65SQL8DS93EK Part-no --
Q2/2020 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 579 $
12 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents --

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
90 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
177 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
193 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
63 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
111 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).

AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800
16 GB GDDR6
154 fps (avg)
Amazon
show more results



Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. AMD Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
2. AMD Radeon RX 6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition
3. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
4. AMD Radeon RX 6800 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G
5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition AMD Radeon RX 6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
6. AMD Radeon RX 6800 EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER KO Gaming AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER KO Gaming
7. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 OC AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 OC
8. AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
9. AMD Radeon RX 6800 AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
10. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
12. AMD Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
13. AMD Radeon RX 6800 KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer White (1-Click OC) AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3090 EX Gamer White (1-Click OC)
14. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition AMD Radeon RX 6800 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Founders Edition vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
15. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro AMD Radeon RX 6800 Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
16. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G AMD Radeon RX 6800 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
19. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Mini vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
20. AMD Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 XTREME 8G AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 XTREME 8G
21. AMD Radeon RX 6800 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming Trio AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Gaming Trio
22. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
23. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming AMD Radeon RX 6800 EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Ultra Hydro Copper Gaming vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
24. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G AMD Radeon RX 6800 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G vs AMD Radeon RX 6800
25. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs AMD Radeon RX 6800


back to index
Facebook
Twitter