KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR vs. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)

GPU comparison with benchmarks

KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR
-VS-
GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
GA104-302-A1 GPU Chip TU106
46 Execution units 34
5888 Shader 2176
96 Render Output Units 64
184 Texture Units 136
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.470 GHz
1.785 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.68 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
220 W TDP 175 W
-- TDP (up) --
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 102 mm Fan 1 3 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
299 mm Length 282 mm
139 mm Height 127 mm
58 mm Width 41 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
37NSL6MD2WEK Part-no 26ISL6HP76GP
Q4/2020 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
2. MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
3. XFX Radeon RX 5700 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) XFX Radeon RX 5700 vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
4. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Black Gaming GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Black Gaming vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
5. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) Palit GeForce RTX 2070 GamingPro GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs Palit GeForce RTX 2070 GamingPro
6. MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) MSI GeForce RTX 2060 AERO ITX 6G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
7. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Founders Edition
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
9. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 Trinity
10. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
11. GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) GALAX GeForce RTX 3090 SG (1-Click OC) vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
12. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (1-Click OC) KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR KFA2 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti (1-Click OC) vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR
13. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Trio 8G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
15. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GAMING OC X3 GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GAMING OC X3
16. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Vulcan OC 8G-V GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Vulcan OC 8G-V vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
17. Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Pegasus GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER Pegasus vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
18. KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti VENTUS 3X 8G OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti VENTUS 3X 8G OC
19. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC)
20. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X WHITE 8G (rev. 1.0) KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING OC 3X WHITE 8G (rev. 1.0) vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR
21. GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 EX (1-Click OC) GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Gamer (1-Click OC) vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2080 EX (1-Click OC)
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G OC KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Aero ITX 8G OC vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 3070 EX White (1-Click OC) LHR


back to index
Facebook
Twitter