Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) vs. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
-VS-
ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Based on AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
GA106-300-A1 GPU Chip Navi 14 XTX
28 Execution units 22
3584 Shader 1408
64 Render Output Units 32
112 Texture Units 88
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.875 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
360 GB/s Memory Bandwith 224 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.320 GHz Base Clock 1.607 GHz
1.777 GHz Boost Clock 1.865 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.74 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
170 W TDP 130 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 95 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 39 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
245 mm Length 242 mm
112 mm Height 130 mm
42 mm Width 49 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 8
Additional data
M-NRTX3060/6RFHPPP-M2500 Part-no DUAL-RX5500XT-O4G-EVO
Q1/2021 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
8 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition
2. EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC OVERCLOCKED ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 SC OVERCLOCKED vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G
3. MSI Radeon RX 5700 Evoke GP Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) MSI Radeon RX 5700 Evoke GP vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO V2 OC Edition Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO V2 OC Edition vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
5. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
6. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
7. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G
8. Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming
9. Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G Zotac GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G
10. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X 12G vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
11. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650
12. ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Advanced Edition Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Advanced Edition vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
13. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Duke 11G OC Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Duke 11G OC vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
15. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Founders Edition vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
16. Colorful GeForce RTX 3070 NB-V Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00) Colorful GeForce RTX 3070 NB-V vs Manli GeForce RTX 3060 (M2500 + 630-00)
17. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
18. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
19. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO OC
20. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO
21. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G
22. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 6GB ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1060 OC edition 6GB
23. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 OC edition ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1080 OC edition
24. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO
25. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660 ASUS Dual Radeon RX 5500 XT OC Evo 4G vs ASUS TUF Gaming X3 GeForce GTX 1660


back to index
Facebook
Twitter