MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 vs. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6)
TU116-300-A1 GPU Chip TU117-300-A1 / TU106-125-A1 / TU116-150-KA-A1
22 Execution units 14
1408 Shader 896
48 Render Output Units 32
88 Texture Units 56
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 4 GB
GDDR5 Memory Type GDDR6
2 GHz Memory Speed 1.5 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 192 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.530 GHz Base Clock 1.410 GHz
1.785 GHz Boost Clock 1.650 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.62 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 75 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
1 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
179 mm Length 200 mm
127 mm Height 124 mm
42 mm Width 39 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
536 g Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no DUAL-GTX1650-O4GD6-MINI
Q1/2019 Release date Q2/2020
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
2. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SC ULTRA GAMING ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 SC ULTRA GAMING
3. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC
4. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 120 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 120 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
6. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 XT ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs Sapphire Radeon RX 6800 XT
7. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 105 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 105 W
8. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition
9. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W
10. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OCV1 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 VENTUS XS 6G OCV1
11. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
12. ASUS GeForce GT 1030 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS GeForce GT 1030 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
13. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Dual ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs Palit GeForce GTX 1660 Dual
14. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT D6 4G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT D6 4G
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
16. ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Advanced Edition ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Advanced Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
17. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
18. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
19. Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) Gainward GeForce GTX 1080 Phoenix GS vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER OC
21. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Gaming OC 12G
22. MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
23. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6)
24. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 MINI OC (GDDR6) vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
25. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Sea Hawk X MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1 MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Sea Hawk X vs MSI GeForce GTX 1660 AERO ITX 6G V1


back to index
Facebook
Twitter