MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GA106-300-A1 GPU Chip TU106
28 Execution units 30
3584 Shader 1920
64 Render Output Units 48
112 Texture Units 120
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.875 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
360 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.320 GHz Base Clock 1.365 GHz
1.777 GHz Boost Clock 1.785 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.76 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
170 W TDP 160 W
170 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
36 dB Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports --
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
276 mm Length 242 mm
131 mm Height 130 mm
51 mm Width 53 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
996 g Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no DUAL-RTX2060-O6G-EVO
Q1/2021 Release date Q3/2019
439 $ Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 3X 12G OC
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 2.0) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 OC 6G (rev. 2.0) vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
3. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
6. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Pegasus OC
7. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming 8G
8. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
9. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
10. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
11. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GamingPro OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
12. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
13. MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING Z TRIO MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING Z TRIO vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
14. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING OC 3X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 GAMING OC 3X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
15. Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G Gainward GeForce RTX 3060 Ghost OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
17. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 2060 Twin Fan vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G
19. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER iCHILL Black MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER iCHILL Black
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Evo MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Evo
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G PNY GeForce RTX 2070 Blower MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 Blower
23. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3060 Twin X2 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
24. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
25. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC) ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition EVO vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 EX Gamer Pink (1-Click OC)


back to index
Facebook
Twitter