MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
-VS-
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
GA104-300-A1 GPU Chip GA102-200-K1-A1
46 Execution units 68
5888 Shader 8704
96 Render Output Units 96
184 Texture Units 272
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 10 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6X
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.188 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 760 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 320 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.440 GHz
1.755 GHz Boost Clock 1.710 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
220 W TDP 320 W
250 W TDP (up) 370 W
93 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 85 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
43-45 dB Noise (Load) 42.5 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
232 mm Length 285 mm
124 mm Height 110 mm
52 mm Width --
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
832 g Weight 1350 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no --
Q4/2020 Release date Q3/2020
649 $ Release price 699 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents --

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition vs PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB
3. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
4. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition
6. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
7. ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS EKWB GeForce RTX 3080 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
9. AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
10. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo
11. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3060 Twin Edge OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
12. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming X Trio 8G
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3090 XC3 ULTRA GAMING
14. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
15. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT
16. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Master 8G
17. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
18. ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC ASUS Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
19. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL Frostbite NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL Frostbite
20. EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER KO GAMING MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC EVGA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER KO GAMING vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC
21. Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3090 GameRock OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Ventus 3X 8G vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Founders Edition
23. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
24. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Vision OC 10G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Vision OC 10G
25. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter