MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
-VS-
MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Navi 21 XT GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
72 Execution units 46
4608 Shader 5888
128 Render Output Units 96
288 Texture Units 184
Memory
16 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
2 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
512 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.850 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
2.285 GHz Boost Clock 1.920 GHz
2.05 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.91 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
300 W TDP 280 W
345 W TDP (up) 300 W
96 °C Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
35 dB Noise (Load) 39-42 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
324 mm Length 335 mm
141 mm Height 140 mm
55 mm Width 61 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
1551 g Weight 1735 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no --
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2020
849 $ Release price 749 $
7 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
2. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM 10G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3080 SUPRIM 10G
4. MSI Radeon RX 6800 Gaming X Trio 16G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G MSI Radeon RX 6800 Gaming X Trio 16G vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
5. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
6. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
7. ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6800 XT OC vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
8. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GAMING X TRIO
9. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
10. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
11. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
12. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
13. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT
14. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
15. PowerColor Radeon RX 6800 Red Devil MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G PowerColor Radeon RX 6800 Red Devil vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
16. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
17. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING X Trio 12G
18. Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G Zotac Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Trinity OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
19. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6800 XT Phantom Gaming D 16G OC
20. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3070 iCHILL X4
21. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3090 VISION OC 24G
22. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
23. ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
24. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G
25. MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter