NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR

GPU comparison with benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
-VS-
Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU (Mobile) Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 LHR
GA107 GPU Chip GA104-302-A1
16 Execution units 46
2048 Shader 5888
40 Render Output Units 96
64 Texture Units 184
Memory
4 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
192 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
128 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.237 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
1.500 GHz Boost Clock 1.770 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
60 W TDP 220 W
75 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Axial
-- Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 42-43 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
-- HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
1x DP v1.4b DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED Addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
-- Length 294 mm
-- Height 112 mm
-- Width 60 mm
-- Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no NE63070S19P2-1041A
Q2/2021 Release date Q2/2021
-- Release price 619 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
2. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
4. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
5. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Founders Edition vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
7. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary Black Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER HOF 10th Anniversary Black Edition vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
8. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
9. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Advanced OC-V Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Advanced OC-V vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
10. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER OC
11. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W AMD Radeon RX 6800M (Mobile) - 145 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs AMD Radeon RX 6800M (Mobile) - 145 W
12. ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR ASRock Radeon RX 5700 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W
14. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
15. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock
16. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO Advanced
17. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC Pro 8G
18. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce OC 2X 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2070 Windforce OC 2X 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR
19. MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super Gallardo (M3445) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W MANLI GeForce RTX 2070 Super Gallardo (M3445) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W
20. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR XFX Radeon RX 580 GTR XXX Edition 8GB White Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro OC V1 LHR vs XFX Radeon RX 580 GTR XXX Edition 8GB White
21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
22. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4
23. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC Edition
24. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 100 W
25. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060


back to index
Facebook
Twitter