NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced

GPU comparison with benchmarks

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W
-VS-
ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Mobile) Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
GA104-770-A1 GPU Chip TU104
30 Execution units 40
3840 Shader 2560
48 Render Output Units 64
120 Texture Units 160
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.163 GHz Base Clock 1.605 GHz
1.530 GHz Boost Clock 1.830 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.80 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
90 W TDP 215 W
105 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max 88 °C
PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Radial Fan-Type Axial
-- Fan 1 3 x 85 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
-- HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4b DP Ports 2x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports 1
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
-- Length 300 mm
-- Height 130 mm
-- Width 54 mm
-- Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
-- Part-no ROG-STRIX-RTX2070S-A8G-GAMING
Q2/2021 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price --
8 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Hybrid Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XC Hybrid Gaming vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
2. Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced Palit GeForce RTX 3080 GameRock OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
3. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6800 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 6800 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
4. INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced INNO3D GeForce RTX 3090 iCHILL X4 vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
5. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
6. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
7. Palit GeForce RTX 2080 GameRock Premium ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced Palit GeForce RTX 2080 GameRock Premium vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
8. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition
9. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 50 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 50 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W
10. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
11. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W
12. Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced Gainward GeForce GTX 1650 Pegasus OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
14. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Sea Hawk EK X
15. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Advanced Edition EVO
16. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 V2 LHR vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 90 W
18. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced
19. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Advanced vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti


back to index
Facebook
Twitter