Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs. Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
-VS-
Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti LHR
GA104-400-A1 GPU Chip GA104-202-A1
48 Execution units 38
6144 Shader 4864
96 Render Output Units 80
192 Texture Units 152
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6X Memory Type GDDR6
1.188 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
608 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.580 GHz Base Clock 1.410 GHz
1.770 GHz Boost Clock 1.695 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.67 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
290 W TDP 200 W
-- TDP (up) 220 W
93 °C Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 85 mm Fan 1 2 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 38 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
294 mm Length 247 mm
112 mm Height 120 mm
60 mm Width 40 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
NED307T019P2-1046A Part-no NE6306TS19P2-190AD
Q2/2021 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 449 $
8 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock OC
2. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti MASTER 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti MASTER 8G
3. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming Z Trio 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
4. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Gainward GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Phoenix Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Gainward GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Phoenix
5. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GameRock
6. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GAMING X TRIO 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GAMING X TRIO 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
7. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA GAMING Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO ULTRA GAMING
8. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SUPRIM X 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SUPRIM X 8G
9. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G SE Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G SE
10. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Dual OC
11. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Ti OC Edition
12. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GameRock
13. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE OC 8G
14. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
15. ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro ZOTAC GAMING GeForce RTX 3070 Ti AMP Holo vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
16. Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER NB 6G-V Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Colorful GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER NB 6G-V vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
17. EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
18. GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG (1-Click OC) Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti SG (1-Click OC) vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
19. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
20. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5500 XT Gaming OC 8G
21. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR GIGABYTE Radeon RX 570 Gaming 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Dual OC V1 LHR
22. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro vs AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT
23. Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro Palit GeForce RTX 3070 GamingPro vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EAGLE 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G vs Palit GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GamingPro


back to index
Facebook
Twitter