PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 vs. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W

GPU comparison with benchmarks

PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
-VS-
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU (Mobile)
TU104 GPU Chip GA104-770-A1
40 Execution units 30
2560 Shader 3840
64 Render Output Units 48
160 Texture Units 120
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 0.900 GHz
1.770 GHz Boost Clock 1.425 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 80 W
-- TDP (up) 95 W
88 °C Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Radial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 --
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports --
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4b
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
Yes DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 Decode
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
314 mm Length --
112 mm Height --
40 mm Width --
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) --
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
VCG20708SDF2MPB Part-no --
Q3/2020 Release date Q2/2021
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 8 nm
-- Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 MSI GeForce RTX 3060 AERO ITX 12G vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
2. Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual V1 PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 Palit GeForce RTX 2060 Dual V1 vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
3. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER FTW3 Ultra Gaming PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER FTW3 Ultra Gaming vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
4. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
5. MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming X Trio 16G vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
6. EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER XC BLACK GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W EVGA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER XC BLACK GAMING vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
7. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G
8. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3080 Eagle 10G
9. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 45 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
10. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W
11. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 125 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
12. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
13. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 ASUS Mining Radeon RX Vega 64 PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 vs ASUS Mining Radeon RX Vega 64
14. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6) vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
15. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
16. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 115 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
17. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
18. MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
19. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop (Mobile) - 35 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
20. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER EVO vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
21. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W
22. PNY GeForce RTX 2070 XLR8 Gaming Overclocked Edition PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1 PNY GeForce RTX 2070 XLR8 Gaming Overclocked Edition vs PNY GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Dual Fan V1
23. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs Colorful GeForce RTX 3060 NB 12G-V
24. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G SE NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 5700 XT 8G SE
25. EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop (Mobile) - 80 W


back to index
Facebook
Twitter