PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra

GPU comparison with benchmarks

PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
-VS-
XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT Based on AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Navi 10 XLE GPU Chip Navi 10 XT
36 Execution units 40
2304 Shader 2560
64 Render Output Units 64
144 Texture Units 160
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
336 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.130 GHz Base Clock 1.730 GHz
1.620 GHz Boost Clock 1.980 GHz
1.56 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.87 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
160 W TDP 225 W
195 W TDP (up) 335 W
-- Tjunction max 89 °C
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
34 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
38 dB Noise (Load) 44 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
240 mm Length 293 mm
118 mm Height 130 mm
40 mm Width 55 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
AXRX 5600 XT 6GBD6-3DHR/OC Part-no --
Q1/2020 Release date Q3/2019
-- Release price 419 $
7 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
2. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus GP XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Ventus GP
3. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Sea Hawk EK X XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Sea Hawk EK X
4. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 Super EX White (1-Click OC) PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs GALAX GeForce RTX 2060 Super EX White (1-Click OC)
5. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 8G XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 5700 8G
6. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GLH XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 Phantom GLH
7. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 8G PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2080 Xtreme Waterforce WB 8G vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
8. EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC Gaming XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra EVGA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER XC Gaming vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
9. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 V2 OC LHR
10. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING 3X 8G XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER GAMING 3X 8G
11. MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ventus 8G OC XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ventus 8G OC vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
12. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 60 W vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
14. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO
15. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO vs XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra
17. ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
18. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
19. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC
20. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G
21. GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG (1-Click OC) PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon GALAX GeForce RTX 3080 SG (1-Click OC) vs PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon
22. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 70 W
23. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT 12G
24. XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 XFX Radeon RX 5700 XT Thicc II Ultra vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060
25. PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition PowerColor Radeon RX 5600 XT Red Dragon vs ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition


back to index
Facebook
Twitter