Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs. Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V

GPU comparison with benchmarks

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
-VS-
Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Navi 21 GPU Chip GP102-350-K1-A1
80 Execution units 28
5120 Shader 3584
128 Render Output Units 88
320 Texture Units 224
Memory
16 GB Memory Size 11 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5X
2 GHz Memory Speed 1.376 GHz
512 GB/s Memory Bandwith 484 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 352 bit
Clock Speeds
1.825 GHz Base Clock 1.480 GHz
2.365 GHz Boost Clock 1.733 GHz
2.14 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.62 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
363 W TDP 250 W
390 W TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 92 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 2x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
Addressable LED LED iGame Energy Core
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 No
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
310 mm Length 322 mm
134 mm Height 146 mm
55 mm Width 53 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
11308-03-20G Part-no --
Q2/2021 Release date Q1/2017
-- Release price --
7 nm Structure size 16 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) Sapphire Toxic Radeon RX 6900 XT Extreme Edition vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
2. MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming Z Trio 16G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) MSI Radeon RX 6900 XT Gaming Z Trio 16G vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
3. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming
4. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo
5. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs ASUS TUF GAMING Radeon RX 6900 XT OC
6. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme 10G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3080 Xtreme 10G vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
7. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs ASUS ROG Strix LC Radeon RX 6900 XT TOP
8. MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) MSI GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Ventus 3X 12G OC vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
9. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT
10. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate
11. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs PowerColor Liquid Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultimate
12. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1660 XC OC
13. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
14. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT
15. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
16. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) MSI Radeon RX 5700 Evoke GP Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 Evoke GP
17. GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EX White (1-Click OC) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EX White (1-Click OC) vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
18. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti FTW3 Ultra Hybrid Gaming
19. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE
20. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs MSI Radeon RX 6800 XT Gaming X Trio 16G
21. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT SE Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6800 XT SE
22. AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
23. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti OC vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0)
24. ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum edition Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V ASUS ROG Poseidon GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Platinum edition vs Colorful iGame GeForce GTX 1080 Ti Vulcan X OC-V
25. Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke OC Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT SE (Rev 2.0) vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 XT Evoke OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter