SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
-VS-
ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Based on AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
Navi 22 XT GPU Chip Navi 22 XT
40 Execution units 40
2560 Shader 2560
64 Render Output Units 64
160 Texture Units 160
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 12 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
2 GHz Memory Speed 2 GHz
384 GB/s Memory Bandwith 384 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
2.321 GHz Base Clock 2.375 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
2.581 GHz Boost Clock 2.620 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
2.42 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 2.47 GHzDeviation vs GPU group+ 2 %
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
230 W TDP 230 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 3 x 90 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode / Encode
Dimensions
260 mm Length 303 mm
120 mm Height 131 mm
50 mm Width 45 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight 890 g
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
11306-02-20G Part-no RX6700XT CLP 12GO
Q1/2021 Release date Q1/2021
-- Release price --
7 nm Structure size 7 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT XFX Radeon RX 6700 XT SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs XFX Radeon RX 6700 XT
2. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
3. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
4. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
5. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING X 12G
6. PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6700 XT SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 6700 XT vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
7. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X
8. MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI Radeon RX 6700 XT MECH 2X 12G vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
9. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
10. PNY GeForce RTX 3060 UPRISING DUAL FAN SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT PNY GeForce RTX 3060 UPRISING DUAL FAN vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
11. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger D 12GB SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger D 12GB
12. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
13. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G
14. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White
15. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
16. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle 12G vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
17. EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 XC Gaming vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
18. MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G OC SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G OC vs SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT
19. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
20. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix GS ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix GS
21. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
22. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Duke 8G SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Duke 8G
23. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 VENTUS 2X 12G
24. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME WATERFORCE 24G ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3090 XTREME WATERFORCE 24G
25. SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER JetStream LE T2 SAPPHIRE PULSE Radeon RX 6700 XT vs Palit GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER JetStream LE T2


back to index
Facebook
Twitter