XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
-VS-
ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Navi 21 GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
80 Execution units 46
5120 Shader 5888
128 Render Output Units 96
320 Texture Units 184
Memory
16 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
2 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
512 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
1.950 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
2.365 GHz Boost Clock 1.845 GHz
2.14 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.82 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
300 W TDP 220 W
345 W TDP (up) 250 W
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 95 mm
1 x 90 mm Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
36 dB Noise (Load) 44-45 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
2x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
1 USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
340 mm Length 300 mm
139 mm Height 127 mm
57 mm Width 52 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
RX-69XTACBD9 Part-no TUF-RTX3070-O8G-GAMING
Q4/2020 Release date Q4/2020
1,199 $ Release price 759 $
7 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
3. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Master 8G
4. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 Ultra Gaming
5. PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
6. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Ultra Gaming vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
7. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 OC Edition
8. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
9. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC
10. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Edge vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
11. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC
12. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 AMP Holo
13. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 XC3 Ultra Gaming
14. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Vision OC 8G
15. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC White ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 OC White
16. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming Radeon RX 6700 XT OC Edition
17. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs PNY GeForce RTX 3090 24GB XLR8 Gaming UPRISING EPIC-X RGB
18. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6900 XT Limited Edition
19. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti FTW3 Ultra Gaming
20. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs PowerColor Red Devil Radeon RX 6800 XT
21. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 vs XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming
22. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim 8G vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
23. ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS KO GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
24. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 6900 XT
25. XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G XFX Speedster MERC 319 Radeon RX 6900 XT Black Gaming vs MSI GeForce RTX 3090 Ventus 3X 24G


back to index
Facebook
Twitter