ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
-VS-
GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
GP104-400-A1 / GP104-410-A1 GPU Chip GP102-350-K1-A1
20 Execution units 28
2560 Shader 3584
64 Render Output Units 88
160 Texture Units 224
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 11 GB
GDDR5X Memory Type GDDR5X
1.35 GHz Memory Speed 1.431 GHz
345 GB/s Memory Bandwith 528 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 352 bit
Clock Speeds
1.771 GHz Base Clock 1.569 GHz
1.911 GHz Boost Clock 1.708 GHz
Avg (Game) Clock 1.68 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
270 W TDP 280 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 100 mm Fan 1 3 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 3x HDMI v2.0b
3x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
ZOTAC SPECTRA LED GIGABYTE RGB Fusion
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
325 mm Length 293 mm
148 mm Height 142 mm
-- Width 55 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
ZT-P10800B-10P Part-no GV-N108TAORUS-11GD
Q2/2016 Release date Q1/2017
-- Release price --
16 nm Structure size 16 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
2. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
3. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Trinity OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Trinity OC
4. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER 8G
5. EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Gaming GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 FTW3 Gaming vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
6. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1070 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1070 8G
7. ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR6/TU106) vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
8. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor MK2 8G GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs MSI Radeon RX 570 Armor MK2 8G
9. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMP Extreme GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 Ti AMP Extreme vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
10. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 1.0) GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Gaming OC 8G (Rev. 1.0)
11. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
12. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GAMING OC 8G ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3070 Ti GAMING OC 8G vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
13. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Founders Edition vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
14. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080 GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3080
15. ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 Ti AMP Holo vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
16. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 FTW+ GAMING 6GB ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1060 FTW+ GAMING 6GB
17. EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 FTW GAMING 2GB ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme EVGA GeForce GTX 1050 FTW GAMING 2GB vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
18. Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Advanced OC 8G-V GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G Colorful iGame GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Advanced OC 8G-V vs GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce GTX 1080 Ti 11G
19. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EXG (1-Click OC) ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs GALAX GeForce RTX 3070 Ti EXG (1-Click OC)
20. PowerColor Radeon RX 6800 ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme PowerColor Radeon RX 6800 vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
21. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
22. ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FOUNDERS EDITION ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme vs EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 FOUNDERS EDITION
23. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 Ti vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
24. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme
25. Palit GeForce GTX 1650 StormX OC D6 ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme Palit GeForce GTX 1650 StormX OC D6 vs ZOTAC GeForce GTX 1080 AMP Extreme


back to index
Facebook
Twitter