ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
-VS-
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
GPU
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT Based on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Navi 22 XT GPU Chip GA104-300-A1
40 Execution units 46
2560 Shader 5888
64 Render Output Units 96
160 Texture Units 184
Memory
12 GB Memory Size 8 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
2 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
384 GB/s Memory Bandwith 448 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 256 bit
Clock Speeds
2.375 GHz Base Clock 1.500 GHz
2.620 GHz Boost Clock 1.800 GHz
2.47 GHz Avg (Game) Clock 1.77 GHz
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
230 W TDP 220 W
-- TDP (up) 250 W
-- Tjunction max 93 °C
2 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 2 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
3 x 90 mm Fan 1 2 x 100 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) 43-45 dB
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 4
2.3 HDCP-Version 2.3
1x HDMI v2.1 HDMI Ports 2x HDMI v2.1
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 3x DP v1.4a
-- DVI Ports --
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_2
Yes Raytracing Yes
No DLSS / FSR Yes
No LED lighting LED Non addressable LED
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
Decode AV1 Decode
Decode / Encode VP8 Decode
Decode / Encode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
303 mm Length 267 mm
131 mm Height 135 mm
45 mm Width 52 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 3 PCIe-Slots
890 g Weight --
PCIe 4.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 4.0 x 16
Additional data
RX6700XT CLP 12GO Part-no DUAL-RTX3070-O8G
Q1/2021 Release date Q4/2020
-- Release price 659 $
7 nm Structure size 8 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3070 OC
2. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G
3. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
4. GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC GIGABYTE Radeon RX 6700 XT GAMING OC 12G vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 3X 8G OC
6. NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Founders Edition vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
7. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
8. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G
9. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs MSI Radeon RX 5700 Gaming X
10. GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE AORUS GeForce RTX 3060 Elite 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
11. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT 12GB vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
12. SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC SAPPHIRE NITRO+ Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
14. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Phantom Gaming D 12GB OC vs ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC
15. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Ventus 2X 8G OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
16. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming X Trio 8G
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS TUF Gaming GeForce RTX 3060 Ti OC
18. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 OC White
19. MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Fan 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Twin Fan 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
20. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 Ti
21. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Gaming OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
22. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3070
23. PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 6700 XT vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
24. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 OC
25. ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix GS ASRock Radeon RX 6700 XT Challenger Pro 12GB OC vs Gainward GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Phoenix GS


back to index
Facebook
Twitter