ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs. GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
-VS-
GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
TU116-400-A1 GPU Chip TU116-300-A1
24 Execution units 22
1536 Shader 1408
48 Render Output Units 48
96 Texture Units 88
Memory
6 GB Memory Size 6 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR6
1.5 GHz Memory Speed 1.75 GHz
288 GB/s Memory Bandwith 336 GB/s
192 bit Memory Interface 192 bit
Clock Speeds
1.500 GHz Base Clock 1.530 GHz
1.800 GHz Boost Clock 1.785 GHz
1.77 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
120 W TDP 125 W
-- TDP (up) --
-- Tjunction max --
1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 8-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Radial
2 x 80 mm Fan 1 1 x 75 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB / Silent Noise (Idle) 0 dB / Silent
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
3 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
2x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports 1x HDMI v2.0b
1x DP v1.4 DP Ports 3x DP v1.4
1 DVI Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
3840x2160 Max. resolution 3840x2160
12_1 DirectX 12_1
No Raytracing No
No DLSS / FSR No
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 Decode
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
215 mm Length 281 mm
121 mm Height 124 mm
44 mm Width 41 mm
2 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-GTX1660TI-6G Part-no 60SRL7MD01BS
Q1/2019 Release date Q4/2019
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 12 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hash values achieved can be easily accessed from any card.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium.




Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s) - Verthash Hashrate

The crypto currency VertCoin (VTC) is calculated with the new Verthash algorithm since January 2021. This is a very memory-intensive PoW algorithm that is difficult to calculate with an ASIC. The developers have set themselves the goal that VertCoin should be calculated via a graphics card and not with so-called ASICs. These are increasingly used in large mining farms. Verthash currently requires a graphics card with at least 2 GB of memory.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
2. ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS GeForce GTX 1650 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
3. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASRock Radeon RX 5500 XT Challenger D 4G OC
4. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 OC
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
6. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
7. GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1650 Advanced (GDDR6) GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce GTX 1650 Advanced (GDDR6)
8. AMD Radeon RX 6800 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI AMD Radeon RX 6800 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
9. GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Prodigy GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super vs GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Prodigy
10. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VENTUS 11G OCV1 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs MSI GeForce RTX 2080 Ti VENTUS 11G OCV1
11. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 Advanced EVO vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
12. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
13. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2080
14. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 50 W ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop (Mobile) - 50 W
15. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
16. GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI GALAX GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EX (1-Click OC) Black vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
17. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
18. ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS ROG Strix Radeon RX 570 4G vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
19. Palit GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER StormX ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI Palit GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER StormX vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
20. Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER StormX ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI Palit GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER StormX vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI
21. ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER EVO OC Edition vs GALAX GeForce GTX 1660 Super
22. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs ASUS ROG Strix GeForce RTX 3090 OC White
23. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL Frostbite ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs INNO3D GeForce RTX 3080 iCHILL Frostbite
24. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8G ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8G
25. ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming M ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1660 TI vs MSI Radeon RX 5600 XT Gaming M


back to index
Facebook
Twitter