ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB

GPU comparison with benchmarks

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC
-VS-
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
GPU
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER Based on NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
TU104 GPU Chip GP107-300-A1
40 Execution units 5
2560 Shader 640
64 Render Output Units 32
160 Texture Units 40
Memory
8 GB Memory Size 2 GB
GDDR6 Memory Type GDDR5
1.75 GHz Memory Speed 1.752 GHz
448 GB/s Memory Bandwith 112 GB/s
256 bit Memory Interface 128 bit
Clock Speeds
1.605 GHz Base Clock 1.354 GHz
1.845 GHz Boost Clock 1.455 GHz
1.82 GHz Avg (Game) Clock
Yes Overclocking Yes
Thermal Design
215 W TDP 75 W
-- TDP (up) --
88 °C Tjunction max --
1 x 6-Pin, 1 x 8-Pin PCIe-Power 1 x 6-Pin
Cooler & Fans
Axial Fan-Type Axial
2 x 90 mm Fan 1 1 x 80 mm
-- Fan 2 --
Air cooling Cooler-Type Air cooling
0 dB Noise (Idle) 0 dB
-- Noise (Load) --
Connectivity
4 Max. Displays 3
2.2 HDCP-Version 2.2
1x HDMI v2.0b HDMI Ports --
3x DP v1.4a DP Ports 1x DP v1.4
-- DVI Ports 1
-- VGA Ports --
-- USB-C Ports --
Featureset
7680x4320 Max. resolution 7680x4320
12_2 DirectX 12_1
Yes Raytracing No
Yes DLSS / FSR No
No LED lighting LED No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs
Decode / Encode h264 Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode h265 / HEVC Decode / Encode
No AV1 No
Decode VP8 No
Decode VP9 Decode
Dimensions
267 mm Length 192 mm
118 mm Height 111 mm
58 mm Width 37 mm
3 PCIe-Slots Width (Slots) 2 PCIe-Slots
-- Weight --
PCIe 3.0 x 16 GPU Interface PCIe 3.0 x 16
Additional data
DUAL-RTX2070S-O8G-EVO Part-no PH-GTX1050-2G
Q3/2019 Release date Q3/2016
-- Release price --
12 nm Structure size 14 nm
data sheet Documents data sheet

Benchmark results

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS) - FP32 (TFLOPS)

The theoretical computing power of the graphics card with single precision (32 bit) in TFLOPS. TFLOPS indicates how many trillion FP32 floating point operations the graphics card (GPU) can perform per second. The larger this number, the faster the graphics card is.




3DMark Benchmark - Time Spy (Performance) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




3DMark Benchmark - Fire Strike (Extreme) Graphics score

3DMark is a benchmark that mainly measures the graphics card. As in almost every graphics card benchmark, however, the system's processor has an effect on the result. We therefore use a fast processor in order not to limit the graphics card during the test.




Battlefield 5 - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Battlefield 5 - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Battlefield 5 is a visually impressive game. It uses the third version of the "Frostbite Game Engine" developed by the manufacturer DICE. The engine is available for Windows, PS4, PS5, XBox One or XBox Series X. Many physics-based calculations are carried out directly in the game engine, which results in very realistic calculations. Due to its current features, Battlefield 5 is very suitable as a graphics card benchmark.

Test environment and settings: DirectX 12 API with max. Details, tested under Windows 10.




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3840x2160 (2160p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 3440x1440 (w1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 2560x1440 (1440p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 (1080p)

Shadow of the Tomb Raider is based on a modified version of the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine. This engine was already used in the predecessor Rise of the Tomb Raider. The foundation engine supports a realistic representation of water and snow and shows the game characters detailed. The display of hair is also very realistic thanks to the support of TressFX (AMD) or HairWorks (NVIDIA).




Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s) - Ethash Hashrate

Ethash is the Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm used for the crypto currency Ethereum. Ethash is based on the Dagger-Hashimoto algorithm, but has been significantly changed in some places. For example, the memory requirement (GPU memory) was significantly increased in order to make it more difficult or even to prevent the calculation of the algorithm on so-called ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). Our benchmark results are based on a slight overclocking of the graphics card and the GPU memory. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s) - Autolykos 2 Hashrate

The crypto currency Ergo is based on the Autolykos algorithm, which was updated in version 2 (Autolykos 2) in early 2021. The Autolykos 2 algorithm is based on the PoW concept and can be efficiently calculated by a graphics card. When calculating Ergo Coins, ASICs have no efficiency advantage over modern graphics cards, which should make Ergo attractive for as many miners as possible. The Ergo protocol is based on the blockchain and has been optimized for a very long shelf life. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s) - KawPow Hashrate

The KawPoW algorithm has been used with the crypto currency Ravencoin since May 2020. Previously, Ravencoin used ProgPoW (X16R and X16Rv2). KawPoW is a Proof-of-Work (PoW) algorithm and is calculated the fastest with a modern graphics card. KawPoW is based on a changing algorithm (X15 and SHA51) and can therefore not be calculated via ASIC. The developers want to protect Ravencoin from large mining farms that often use ASICs. In addition to Ravencoin, other cryptocurrencies are based on KawPoW, including Hilux and Gravium. The hashrates were achieved under Hive OS with moderate overclocking settings.




Popular comparisons

1. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Windforce 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 2080 Windforce 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC
3. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Eagle OC 12G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC
4. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3070 Gaming OC 8G
5. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs ASUS Dual Radeon RX 6700 XT
6. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
7. MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8G vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
8. XFX Radeon RX 5500 XT Thicc II Pro ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB XFX Radeon RX 5500 XT Thicc II Pro vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
9. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 OC Edition
10. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 OC edition 2GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS Cerberus GeForce GTX 1050 OC edition 2GB
11. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 EX (1-Click OC) ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs KFA2 GeForce RTX 2060 EX (1-Click OC)
12. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent
13. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
14. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3070
15. ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC vs MSI GeForce RTX 3060 GAMING 12G
16. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent DDR4 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS GeForce GT 1030 silent DDR4
17. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G LHR ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs MSI GeForce RTX 3070 Suprim X 8G LHR
18. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 3060
19. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo LHR ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ZOTAC Gaming GeForce RTX 3080 AMP Holo LHR
20. Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GRP ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC Palit GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER GRP vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC
21. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS Dual series GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
22. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB ASUS GeForce GT 1030 ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs ASUS GeForce GT 1030
23. ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Single Fan ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB vs PNY GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER 6GB XLR8 Gaming OC Single Fan
24. MSI GEFORCE GTX 1070 TI ARMOR 8G ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB MSI GEFORCE GTX 1070 TI ARMOR 8G vs ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1050 2GB
25. GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 3060 Ti Vision OC 8G vs ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER EVO OC


back to index
Facebook
Twitter